Perkins v. Brock
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
Action by the assignee of an insolvent partnership to recover certain personal property alleged to have been transferred in fraud of creditors. Judgment passed for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.
The findings negative the charges of fraud. And as the evidence is not brought up, the findings must be taken to be true.
The main contention of the appellant is, that the transfer was void for want of authority in the person who made it. The only difficulty arises from inattention to a few simple rules of pleading.
The plaintiff began by placing inconsistent allegations in the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blasingame v. Home Ins. Co. of City of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Miller v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Thompson v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by15 opinions
- County of San Luis Obispo v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Joyce v. RubinIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Stetson v. BriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Elliott v. BertschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.