Legal Opinion

Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. Argo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 31, 1932No. 6 Div. 99PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, C. .1.

As we view this action, counts A and B, it is for a rescission and recovery of the sums heretofore paid upon the ground of fraud or deceit in inducing the plaintiff to enter into the contract. The counts not only set out the fraud and deceit, but expressly charge that plaintiff demanded of the defendant a return of his money, and tendered to the defendant the certificates of stock, and the defendant refused to refund said money to plaintiff and to accept the surrender of said stock. These' counts are different from the one dealt with in the case of Sou. Bldg. & Loan…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Young v. Arntze & Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Day v. BroylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Comer v. FranklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Stanford v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Gorman-Gammill Seed & Dairy Supply Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tollett v. Montgomery Real Estate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Southern Land Development Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Lacey v. Edmunds Motor CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. State Building & Loan Ass'n v. BradwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. National Finance Corporation v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API