Gorman-Gammill Seed & Dairy Supply Co. v. Carlisle
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The note upon which this suit is based was given for the purchase price of a small light and water plant for use at the home of appellee, including his dairy. At the time of the installation of the plant, appellee executed a note due 90 days thereafter. It is claimed that another note was given in its renewal, and the note sued on was a second renewal. The interest was paid at each renewal. Before the last note was due, appellee notified appellant of his election to rescind. This was some 8 months after the plant was installed. It is claimed by appellee that the plant did not operate…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Stephenson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Hafer v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Independent Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- McCoy v. PrinceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
- Baer & Co. v. Mobile Cooperage & Box Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tiger Motor Co. v. McMurtrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Central of Georgia Railway Company v. RamseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- McKee v. Club-View Heights, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. ArgoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Salt Lake City v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.