Legal Opinion

Day v. Broyles

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1931No. 6 Div. 837PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This is an action for money had and received, and it is sufficient in form to sustain a recovery for money paid by plaintiff to defendant upon the execution of a contract for the purchase of realty from defendant, upon a claim that plaintiff was induced to make the purchase and pay the amount on account of the fraud of the defendant in making the sale. Chandler v. Wilder, 215 Ala. 209, 110 So. 306.

There was no necessity, therefore, for special counts, and it could work no injury to appellant to sustain demurrers to them, leaving the common count for money had and ■received.

We have often…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fairbanks Morse & Co. v. DeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Chandler v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Maxwell v. ShermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Coleman v. Night Commander Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Thompson v. Fourth Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Wrede v. Exchange Bank of GibbonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hillcrest Center, Inc. v. RoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Bankers' Mortg. Bond Co. v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Mutual Savings Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API