Legal Opinion

Kersh v. MANULIFE FINANCIAL CORP.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 31, 2011No. Civil 09-00049 JMS/BMKPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On February 4, 2009, Plaintiff David Kersh (“Plaintiff’) filed this action against Defendants Manulife Financial Corporation (“Manulife”), John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. aka John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA) (“John Hancock”), and North American Life Assurance Co. (“NALA”), (collectively, “Defendants”), asserting state law claims stemming from a life insurance policy Plaintiff purchased on March 20, 1978. Defendants assert that Plaintiff purchased a whole life insurance…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Catholic Charities of Southwest Kansas, Inc. v. PHL Variable Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  2. Malabe v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Executive Ctr.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Spalter v. American National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API