Legal Opinion

Royal Realty Co. v. Harvey Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1928No. Docket No. 3643PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This is an action for the specific performance of a contract for the exchange of real property, made between II. IT. Helbush, assignor of plaintiffs, and defendant corporation, Harvey Investment Company. The contract consisted of a memorandum offer and acceptance. It provides for the exchange of a ranch at Paso Robies (belonging to plaintiff York Realty Com pany) for two pieces of business property in the city of Los Angeles, belonging to defendant Harvey Investment Company. The said ranch was to be included in the transaction, subject to a $40,000 mortgage, due one year…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Quarg v. ScherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Horton v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Sharp v. PitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burr v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API