Legal Opinion

Beder v. Cleveland Browns, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1998No. 72500PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Timothy E. McMonagle, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Howard Beder, and the class he represents (collectively referred to as “appellants”) appeal the decision of the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment to the Cleveland Browns, Inc. and related companies (collectively referred to as the “Browns”). For the reasons that follow, we find summary judgment inappropriate on several issues and, therefore, affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

This case involves the events surrounding the Browns’ announcement in November 1995 to move…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mayer v. BelichickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Olson v. Major League BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  3. Charpentier v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. In Re BergtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 1999
  5. Dubin v. Security Union Title InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API