City of Eureka v. Croghan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a' judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
The only question to be determined in this case is, whether the land in controversy was dedicated by Cushing to public use as a street.
*525On April 7, 1870, Cushing, who was then the owner of the land in controversy, together with other lands, executed to one Leary a deed of land, which was described therein as follows: “Commencing at a point distant in a southerly direction six hundred feet from the northwest corner of block 108, as laid down on the official map of the town of Eureka, made by J. S. Murray, and filed in the office of the county recorder of said county July 28,1869, said point of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Breed v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Hayward v. ManzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by14 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
- City of Eureka v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Spencer v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.