Robinson-Goodman Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Dissent
*159DISSENTING OPINION
Hatfield, Judge:
I regret that I am unable to concur in the views expressed by a majority of my associates.
Artificial flowers, composed in chief value of textile yarns, threads, and filaments, were assessed for duty as “trimmings” and “ornaments” at 90 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1430 of the Tariff Act of 1922.
It is claimed by appellant that they are properly dutiable under paragraph 1419.
The statutes involved are as follows:
Pae. 1430. Laces, lace window curtains, burnt-out laces and embroideries capable of conversion into burnt-out laces, nets and nettings,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Marvel v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.