Legal Opinion

City of St. Charles Ex Rel. Palmer v. Schulte

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 31, 1924PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment recovered against him by the city of St. Charles for an occupation tax imposed by one of its ordinances on vendors of soft drinks. The ordinance, so far as material to the questions involved in this controversy, was as follows:

“Section 69. Soft Drink Vendors. Any person, firm or corporation engaged in the business of selling or vending soft drinks or non-intoxicating liquors such as bottled sodas of any kind, or soda pop, coca cola, ginger ale, or other drinks, or any near-beer or so called beverage made or manufactured wholly or in part from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wyatt v. AshbrookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Carroll v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Kansas City v. GrushSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. City of St. Louis v. SpiegelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  5. Hayes v. ManningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Automobile Gasoline Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Asotsky v. ReganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. State v. Hallenberg-Wagner Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. First National Bank of Kansas City v. DanforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API