IHT CORP. v. Paragon Cutlery Co., Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
[¶ 1] Paragon Cutlery appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court (Biddeford, Mullen, J.) denying its motion to dismiss IHT’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Paragon contends that this ease presents an exception to the final judgment rule and is therefore ripe for appeal, and that the court erred in determining that it does have personal jurisdiction over the case. Because we conclude that Paragon’s appeal is interlocutory and presents no exception to the final judgment rule, we dismiss the appeal and do not address the merits of the District Court’s determination of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Architectural Woodcraft Co. v. ReadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Hawkes v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Millett v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Munsey v. GrovesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Passalaqua v. PassalaquaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Estate of Dore v. DoreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Ann Salerno v. Spectrum Medical Group, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019