Legal Opinion
United States v. Lamb
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided December 11, 1968No. Crim. A. No. 7034PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*420MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The defendant Mr. Lamb was convicted by a jury under an indictment charging him with the unlawful possession of a weapon made from a 12-gauge shotgun, with a barrel 17%” in length, which had not been made in compliance with the requirements of 26 U.S.C. § 5821.1 He interposed thereafter a timely motion to arrest the judgment, Rule 34, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on the ground that the indictment charges no offense and renewed, Rule 29(c), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, his motion for entry of a judgment of acquittal, theretofore…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rossi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Valmore J. Forgett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. David Louis CollierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Walter PosnjakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Commonwealth v. HouckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- People v. CortezNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- District of Columbia v. GreenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. KellyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972