Legal Opinion

Resnik v. Morganstern

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 17, 1923PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Suit for the specific performance of a contract to sell and convey real estate in Bridgeport owned by the defendant, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County where the plaintiff was non-suited in a trial to the jury before Wolfe, J., and from the refusal of the trial court to set aside such judgment the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The plaintiff offered evidence to prove these facts: The plaintiff employed one Schnee to negotiate with the defendant, the owner, for the purchase of the premises known as numbers 1200 and 1202 Main Street, Bridgeport, and Schnee, with the authority of the plaintiff, engaged Leopold Weiss to secure from the defendant a contract for the sale of this property. After considerable negotiation with the defendant, Mr. Weiss reported to the plaintiff that the defendant had agreed to sell upon the following terms: to convey the premises free and clear of all encumbrance for $80,000, $3,000 to be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Ward v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Smith v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  4. Girard v. Grosvenordale Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  5. Baggish v. OffengandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. MacKay v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Cyphers v. AllynSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Corcoran v. JacovinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Sullivan v. ThorndikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API