Legal Opinion

In re Cellular Telephone

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 28, 2021No. C.A. No. 6885-VCLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ) COORDINATED. C.A. No. 6885-VCL PARTNERSHP LITIGATION ) THIS FILING APPLIES TO COODINATED CIVIL ACTIONS 6886 AND 6908 MEMORANDUM OPINION ADDRESSING CLAIMS FOR BREACH OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT GOVERNING SALEM CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY Date Submitted: July 28, 2021 Date Decided: September 28, 2021 Carmella P. Keener, COOCH AND TAYLOR, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Thomas R. Ajamie, David S. Siegel, Ryan van Steenis, AJAMIE LLP, Houston, Texas; Michael A. Pullara, Houston, Texas; Marcus E. Montejo, Kevin H. Davenport,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. American Legacy FoundationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. First Hartford Corp. Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API