Legal Opinion

State Board of Medical Examiners v. O'Neill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 30, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The writ of certiorari in this case was allowed to review the conviction of the prosecutor, William H. O’Neill,, in the District Court of Camden.- The defendant was charged with the violation of Pamph. L. 1921, pp. 702, 708, § 10, the act to regulate the practice of medicine and surgery.

The prosecutor is a licensed osteopath practicing. at Cam•den, New Jersey. He filed eleven reasons for a reversal of the judgment in the Camden District Court, which are argued under four heads in the prosecutor’s, brief. First. The medical 'law-can only apply to those who actually practice medicine -and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Board of Medical Examiners v. De YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joyner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Heintze v. New Jersey State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API