State Board of Medical Examiners v. O'Neill
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The writ of certiorari in this case was allowed to review the conviction of the prosecutor, William H. O’Neill,, in the District Court of Camden.- The defendant was charged with the violation of Pamph. L. 1921, pp. 702, 708, § 10, the act to regulate the practice of medicine and surgery.
The prosecutor is a licensed osteopath practicing. at Cam•den, New Jersey. He filed eleven reasons for a reversal of the judgment in the Camden District Court, which are argued under four heads in the prosecutor’s, brief. First. The medical 'law-can only apply to those who actually practice medicine -and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Board of Medical Examiners v. De YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Joyner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Heintze v. New Jersey State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931