Legal Opinion

Mireles v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 2, 1963No. 67670; protest 329377-K (Laredo)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest relates to a certain commodity which was classified under the provision for “Barytes ore, crude or unmanufactured,” in paragraph 67 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by T.D. 54108, carrying a duty assessment of $2.85 per ton. Plaintiff claims that the goods are free of duty under the provision in paragraph 1719 of the Tariff Act of 1930, for crude minerals, not specially provided for.

*286Stipulated facts, upon which, the case has been submitted, show that the present merchandise is crude minerals, that it contains “less than 40 percent barium sulphate, more…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hayes-Sammons Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API