Mireles v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
This protest relates to a certain commodity which was classified under the provision for “Barytes ore, crude or unmanufactured,” in paragraph 67 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by T.D. 54108, carrying a duty assessment of $2.85 per ton. Plaintiff claims that the goods are free of duty under the provision in paragraph 1719 of the Tariff Act of 1930, for crude minerals, not specially provided for.
*286Stipulated facts, upon which, the case has been submitted, show that the present merchandise is crude minerals, that it contains “less than 40 percent barium sulphate, more…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hayes-Sammons Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966