Legal Opinion
Hardin v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 8, 1976No. 31180PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Justice.
The issue here involves the construction of farm and timber leases and a declaration of respective rights of the parties.
On May 9, 1960, Harry W. Peeples and Southern Land, Timber & Pulp Corporation entered into three contracts. One was a timber contract whereby Peeples *595agreed to sell and Southern agreed to buy all timber and timber rights and one-half the mineral rights which Peeples owned on 3,970 acres of land. The term of the contract was for a period of 66 years. The second was a leaseback contract of 200 acres which has now expired and is not a mattér of contention. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Chalkley v. WardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Dyal v. Foy & Shemwell Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rizk v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Ralls Corp. v. Huerfano River Wind, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
- Sofran Peachtree City, LLC v. Peachtree City Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Interstate Fire Insurance v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Mickel v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.