Legal Opinion

Dyal v. Foy & Shemwell Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 21, 1925No. 4243PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusseli, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

There is a motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions. It is predicated upon the ground, that, in that portion of the judge’s certificate where the clerk is directed to transmit the bill of exceptions and a transcript of the record to this court, the word “Superior” was used instead of the word “Supreme,” so that in this certificate it appears that the clerk of the superior court of Dougherty county was directed to transmit the record to the “Superior Court of Georgia.” The motion to dismiss is based upon the proposition, that, inasmuch as the trial judge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Castleberry v. ParrishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Scott v. WhippleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hardman v. Dahlonega-Lumpkin County Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Hardin v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Ralls Corp. v. Huerfano River Wind, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  4. Cocke v. Bank of DawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Employers Commercial Union Insurance v. WrennCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API