Legal Opinion

Senay v. Meehan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 13, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In determining whether the judge erred in allowing the defendants’ *855motion under Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), 365 Mass. 755 (1974), we confine our consideration to the questions which were raised and passed upon below, as disclosed by the stated grounds of the motion and the opposing memoranda of law which were submitted to the motion judge (all of which have been reproduced in the plaintiff’s appendix). Compare John B. Deary, Inc. v. Crane, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 719, 724 (1976). 1. The question of a possible misjoinder of parties cannot be raised by a motion filed under Rule 12(b) (6); in any event,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Charbonnier v. AmicoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. John B. Deary, Inc. v. CraneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  4. Sharratt v. Housing Innovations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Romano v. SacknoffMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kipp v. KuekerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. Endodontic Associates of Lexington, Inc. v. Johnston-NeeserMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API