Legal Opinion

Mangerchine v. Reaves

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 2011No. 2010 CA 1052PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaidry, J.

|2The plaintiff homeowners, husband and wife, appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims against their homeowners insurer for property damage and personal injury alleged to have resulted from hidden redhibitory defects at the time they purchased their home. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The plaintiffs, Lawrence P. Mangerchine and Kim C. Mangerchine, purchased immovable property, including a house, from Robert F. Reaves and Dawn Oglesby Reaves on July 26, 1996. The defendant, Travelers Indemnity of Connecticut (Travelers), subsequently…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Magnon v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  5. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Q Clothier v. Twin City Fire InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  2. Niemann v. Crosby Development Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Adler & Sons v. Axis Surplus Ins CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  4. Randal Strauss v. Chubb Indemnity Insurance CompCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n v. BASF Construction Chemicals, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API