Legal Opinion
Niemann v. Crosby Development Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 2012No. 2011 CA 1337PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHigginbotham, J.
| sThe plaintiff homeowners appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims against a subcontractor’s commercial general liability insurer for property damage alleged to have resulted from defective Chinese-manufactured drywall that the subcontractor installed in their home before they purchased it. For the following reasons, we vacate the judgment, sustain the peremptory exception of no right of action noticed by this court on our own motion, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In February 2006, Crosby Development Company, L.L.C.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Tranum v. HebertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Howard v. Administrators of Tulane Ed. FundSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Shannon v. VannoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Gorman v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. BoohakerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Moore v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Bouquet v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.