Legal Opinion
Lavaca School District No. 3 v. Charleston School District No. 9
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 10, 1990No. 90-216PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis H. Turner, Justice.
This controversy involves a dispute between Lavaca School District No. 3 and Charleston School District No. 9 over which district is entitled to the tax revenue from 3,386.53 acres of real property formerly located in the now-defunct Mays Chapel School District No. 20 (Mays Chapel) and the Ursula School District No. 31 (Ursula). Though a number of salient facts and records are apparently missing, we find, based upon the record before us, that the decision of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, and we affirm.
Charleston School District No. 9…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trapnall v. BurtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1866
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. LasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Baker-Matthews Lumber Company v. Bank of LepantoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Carter Sp. Sch. Dist. v. Hollis Sp. Sch. Dist.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Moorehead v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- J.W. Reynolds Lumber Co. v. Smackover State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Anadarko Petroleum Co. v. VenableSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Nash v. Landmark Storage, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- Timberland Bancshares, Inc. v. Garrison (In re Lee)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2011
- J.W. Reynolds Lumber Co. v. Smackover State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992