Mollett v. United Benefit Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentPetrie, C.J.
(dissenting)—I am compelled to dissent. It is a fundamental tenet of insurance contract law that one who has been irrevocably designated a beneficiary of a life insurance policy acquires a vested interest in the proceeds thereof, which can neither be impaired nor extinguished by the insured, nor by the insurer, nor by the two acting together. 4 R. Anderson, Couch on Insurance 2d § 27:56 (1960); 2 J. Appleman, Insurance Law and Practice § 911 (1966). Through the years, no decision in this jurisdiction has in the slightest degree altered this basic tenet. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Toulouse v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Occidental Life Insurance Co. of California v. GannonWashington Supreme Court · 1961