State v. Lay
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Two issues are raised in this appeal: whether this Court has jurisdiction to hear the State’s appeal, and whether Judge Kirby *798correctly applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel to bar the State’s relitigation of the validity of the search warrant, on defendant’s motion to suppress on the felony charge in Superior Court.
Whether we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal is the threshold issue. The State’s right to appeal derives solely from applicable statutes, which must be strictly construed. State v. Harrell, 279 N.C. 464, 183 S.E. 2d 638 (1971); State v. Dobson, 51 N.C. App.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. DobsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Commonwealth v. LaganaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- In the Matter of PkmCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012