Utain v. Crum Creek Construction Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, J.,
In this negligence action, plaintiffs Irwin and Shirley Utain allege that defendants Crum Creek Construction Company and Quintel Homes violated a regulatory safety standard at a construction site, which caused plaintiff Irwin Utain’s injuries. After plaintiffs presented their evidence at trial, I granted defendants’ motion for compulsory nonsuit, as I had concluded that plaintiffs had failed to meet their burden of proof on the causation element of their cause of action. Before me now is plaintiffs’ motion to take off nonsuit. Based on the following reasoning, the motion will be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Ford v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.