McCall v. Dixie Cartage & Warehousing, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The defendants, by proper motions, challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury on plaintiff’s specifications of negligence. The defendants conditionally pleaded plaintiff’s contributory negligence. However, the defendants did not offer evidence. The plaintiff’s evidence does not establish contributory negligence as a matter of law. Doubtful it is whether the evidence was sufficient to permit the jury to consider contributory negligence. However, since plaintiff was successful before the jury, the submission of the issue was not prejudicial.
The evidence disclosed that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Short v. Chapman Ex Rel. RhoneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Fone v. ElloianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Glaser v. SchroederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Stephens v. Southern Oil Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Fuller v. MagattiMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corns v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Wiggins v. Paramount Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Smith ex rel. Smith v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969