Legal Opinion

Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. City of Winston-Salem

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1990No. 8921SC1384PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.. Plaintiff-appellant contends the trial court erred in denying its directed verdict motion on the issues of actual and apparent authority.

In its first assignment of error, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion for directed verdict on the issue of actual authority. The jury having answered the issue of actual authority in plaintiff’s favor, plaintiff was not prejudiced by the denial of its motion for a directed verdict on that issue. See McCall v. Warehousing, Inc., 272 N.C. 190, 158 S.E.2d 72 (1967).

Plaintiff also contends the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Bullins v. SchmidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Childress v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. King v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Coates v. Niblock Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Hamlin v. Ivy ConstructionNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API