Legal Opinion
In re Yao
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 17, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent, Richard Yao, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on February 27, 1985. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent resided and conducted business, but did not actively practice law, within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) moves for an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (d) and Judiciary Law § 90 (2), finding respondent guilty of professional misconduct in violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (A) (3) (22 NYCRR 1200.3) (engaging in…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- In re GreenwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- In re MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4Cited by7 opinions
- In re CapocciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Dawkins v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- In re LatimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re YaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re GogelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.