Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rich v. East 10th Street Associates LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 27, 2010Published

1Dissent

Tom, J.P. (dissenting).

These actions, consolidated for disposition, seek recovery of rent overcharges in the amount paid under a lease subject to the Rent Stabilization Law of 1969. While the actions are governed by the four-year statute of limitations of CPLR 213-a, the issue to be decided is whether the statutory proscription against “examination of the rental history of the housing accommodation prior to the four-year period immediately preceding the commencement of the action” encompasses a rent reduction order that was issued prior to the limitations period.

Resolution of these matters…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gilman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Thornton v. BaronNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Lavanant v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Ador Realty, LLC v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API