State v. Adolphe
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Howell, Chief Judge:
Defendant Antonnier Adolphe was convicted of two counts of trafficking crack cocaine. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Adolphe argues several issues on appeal. First, he contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. Second, Adolphe asserts the trial court erred in denying his new trial motion based on the judge’s granting a directed verdict to the co-defendants. Finally, he argues the trial court erred in denying his severance motion and the related new trial motion.
On the evening of October 1, 1991,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- State v. BowieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- State v. GoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.