Legal Opinion

State v. Adolphe

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 1994No. 2140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Howell, Chief Judge:

Defendant Antonnier Adolphe was convicted of two counts of trafficking crack cocaine. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Adolphe argues several issues on appeal. First, he contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. Second, Adolphe asserts the trial court erred in denying his new trial motion based on the judge’s granting a directed verdict to the co-defendants. Finally, he argues the trial court erred in denying his severance motion and the related new trial motion.

On the evening of October 1, 1991,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. BowieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. State v. GoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API