Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 30, 1995No. 2350PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Allen C. Arnold was convicted of second-degree burglary, grand larceny and attempted safecracking. On appeal, he challenges the validity to two search warrants, and the trial court’s failure to suppress all evidence deriving from the warrants. We affirm.

On May 1,1992, Officer Rocky Senn submitted the following affidavit to the magistrate in support of the first search warrant issued in this case:

That on 4-17-92, during the early morning hours Kinko’s Copies located at 7359 Two Notch was burglarized and the items sought were stolen. On 4-8-92, an employee of Kinko’s was held responsible for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. OwenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. AdolpheCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. BowieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. DriggersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Care and Treatment of Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API