Legal Opinion

Reever v. White

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the third district. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, J.:

By consent of the attorneys in this ease, an order was made referring it to a referee “to take the testimony in the case, and report to the court his findings of fact and conclusions of law, and report to the court with all convenient speed.” The referee afterwards reported that testimony was introduced on behalf of the plaintiff, and that after its conclusion, and after the plaintiff had rested his case, the defendants moved the court to dismiss the case, for the reason that plaintiff had not shown facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against any of the defendants; that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hihn v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Reynolds v. BrumagimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. DeLong v. StahlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  4. Forbes v. ChichesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Connor v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Belmont Mining & Milling Co. v. CostiganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Hecla Gold Mining Co. v. GisbornUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Perego v. DodgeUtah Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API