Scott v. Guiberson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Yakey, J., entered March 26, 1912, in favor of the plaintiff, confirming a sale on execution, after a hearing before the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Plaintiff Scott secured a judgment against the defendant Guiberson. Thereafter Guiberson came into a devise of some real property situate in Pierce county. Execution was levied upon this property, which was wild, unoccupied, and unenclosed. Thereupon defendant filed a declaration of homestead, saying:
“Said land is at the present time in a wild and uncultivated condition, and there are no buildings of any character on said land; that as rapidly as my means will permit I am placing said land under cultivation and intend to erect thereon a residence suitable for the occupancy of myself and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. Western Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Whitworth v. McKeeWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Krutz v. BattsWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Harding v. Atlantic Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Field v. GreinerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HoldenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Traverso v. CeriniWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Finch's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Costanzo v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Domke v. BeckWashington Supreme Court · 1943