Ernest v. Tac Amusement Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
REGAN, Judge.
The plaintiff, Joseph Ernest, instituted this suit against the defendants, Tac Amusement Company and its workmen’s compensation insurer, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, endeavoring to recover the sum of $14,000.00 for total and permanent disability resulting from injuries which he asserts he incurred on July 19, 1962, in the course and scope of his employment. He also seeks reparation for medical expenses, interest, penalties, and attorney’s fees.
Defendants answered and denied that they are liable for compensation payments to the plaintiff. They insist that while they had been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Guillory v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burk v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Carlisle v. Employers Mutuals of WausauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Carles v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- McGee v. Continental Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Sykes v. United Engineers Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965