Legal Opinion

Carles v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1966No. 6582PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANDRY, Judge.

The instant appeal presents for determination only the question of quantum due plaintiff, Louis Carles, for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident admittedly resulting from the negligence of an assured of defendant, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company.

Following trial of the aforesaid issue below, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $4,000.00 for pain and suffering and $213.00 for special damages. Defendant, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, (sometimes hereinafter referred to simply as “Hartford”), has appealed seeking a reduction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Guillory v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Ernest v. Tac Amusement Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGuire v. OliverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Mitchell Bros. v. DinvautLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Thibodeaux v. St. Joseph HospitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Carlisle v. Employers Mutuals of WausauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Carles v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API