Legal Opinion

Williams v. Buchanan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of Davidson .County. —Hon. A. G. Rutherford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The parties to this action will be referred to according to their status in the court below; that is, as petitioner and defendants.

Petitioner, Tom Buchanan, filed his petition in the- circuit court of Davidson county against defendants, Boyd Williams and Southern Surety Company, to recover compensation alleged to be due him under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Acts 1919, chapter 123), for an injury sustained August 4, 1922, while in the employ of one John Turner, a subcontractor of the defendant Williams, who was engaged in constructing one of the highways of this State under a contract with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Laffery v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommmisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Stephens v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stratton v. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hartwell Motor Co., Inc. v. HickersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Clendening v. London Assurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Olsen v. SharpeTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Siskin v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API