Legal Opinion

Browder-Manget Co. v. West End Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Ellis. Eulton superior court. July 3, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. A petition alleged in substance as follows: A gave to B his promissory note, which was afterwards indorsed to T, and by T to the plaintiff. Upon maturity of the note, B,. the payee and first indorser, gave his bank-check to the plaintiff, who surrendered to him the note, which was then by B surrendered to_A. The cheek was dishonored by the bank upon which it was drawn. The plaintiff demanded of A and B the note, offering to return the check; but they refused to return the note or pay it. B has been adjudicated a bankrupt. The plaintiff can not attach a copy of the note. Notice of intention…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Barron v. BarronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Loggins v. LogginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Mullins v. AutrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Dumas v. Stafford & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API