Legal Opinion

Loggins v. Loggins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1941No. 13597PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

While the evidence is in conflict, it is sufficient to authorize the judge, in the exercise of the discretion vested in him by the Code, §§ 30-127, 30-206, and 74-107, to render the judgment excepted to. Counsel for the plaintiff recognizes these rules of law, and virtually concedes that the evidence would authorize the judge in the exercise of a discretion to render the judgment excepted to; but he insists that the judgment is erroneous, because the record shows that the judge failed to exercise any discretion, and based his judgment upon an erroneous conception of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Allen v. KesslerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Holton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Browder-Manget Co. v. West End BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fortson v. FortsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Irwin v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Irwin v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API