Legal Opinion

Scoular Co. v. Denney

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2006No. 05CA0200Published

1Opinion of the Court

151 P.3d 615 (2006)

SCOULAR COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Doug DENNEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05CA0200.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V.

November 2, 2006.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing December 14, 2006.

McGloin, Davenport, Severson and Snow, P.C., Krista L. Tushar, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Block Markus Williams, L.L.C., Donald J. Quigley, Denver, Colorado, for Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion by Judge DAILEY.

In this contract action, defendant, Doug Denney, appeals from the trial court's judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Scoular Company. We reverse and remand with…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Bishop Collins v. Gerald ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API