Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Harvey District Court. Action by Johnson against Tyler and others, to enjoin the sale of certain property under execution. Judgment for the plaintiff, at the May term, 1888. The defendants bring the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Green, C.:

R. M. Hamill owned and occupied certain premises in Harvey county as a homestead. On the 8th day of August, 1883, he conveyed the same to his wife, Ruby E. Hamill. Some time before such conveyance, R. M. Hamill had purchased of M. S. Tyler, doing business as the. Western Lumber Company, certain lumber and materials for use in the construction of improvements on such premises. On the 4th day of January, 1884, R. M. Hamill gave to the Western Lumber Company his note for the balance due for such material. A suit was afterward commenced by M. S. Tyler, as the Western Lumber…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. OverackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Greeno v. BarnardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Farmers State Bank v. PickeringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Dreese v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. DePriest v. RansomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Dotson-Murray Fruit Co. v. LeibrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API