Legal Opinion

Dotson-Murray Fruit Co. v. Leibrand

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 25, 1936No. 32,494PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for money. Judgment was obtained by plaintiff. The trial court stayed further proceedings when plaintiff attempted to force the sale of defendant’s homestead to satisfy the judgment. Plaintiff appeals.

On November 19, 1932, Christ Leibrand, defendant, filed his petition in bankruptcy. Among his assets he listed the land which is here in controversy. He claimed this land to be exempt as a homestead. Plaintiff filed its claim in the bankruptcy proceeding, and it was allowed. Thereafter the order allowing the claim was set…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steger v. Traveling Men's Building & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Greeno v. BarnardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Gaylord v. LoughridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Lewton v. HowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  5. Andrews v. AlcornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. ParrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. DePriest v. RansomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. In re FakhariUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API