Paraiso v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. The facts aré stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
The plaintiff in error was convicted of falsification of documents, under Article 300, clauses 4, 7 of the Philippine Penal Code. He brings the case here as one in which a. statute of the United States is involved, under the act of July 1, 1902, c. 1369, § 10, 32 Stat. 695. By the article mentioned a public official is subjected to imprisonment and fine if he commits a falsification,.clause 4, “By perverting the truth in the narra-' tion of facts,” or, clause 7, “By giving out an authentic copy of a fictitious document, or by stating therein a "contrary or different thing from that contained…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Neil v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Missouri v. DockerySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ansbro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cornell v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. S. Lawrence Kahn, Arthur B. Sachs and M. Prial CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Bernard B. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re RidingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.