Wilhide v. Keystone Insurance Company
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This matter is presently before the Court on motion of defendant to dismiss for the following reasons:
1. Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.
2. Lack of jurisdiction over the person of the plaintiff.
3. Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
4. Failure to join Warehousing and Equipment Corporation, assured, as an indispensible party.
This being a motion to dismiss based on the insufficiency of the com plaint to set forth a cause of action, the facts averred in the complaint must be taken as admitted. 2 Moore’s Fed. Practice, 2d Ed., H 12.08.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keystone Insurance v. Warehousing & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- A. Rose & Son, Inc. v. Zurich General Accident, Etc., Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Binswanger v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Litto v. Public Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Medeiros v. First Insurance Co. of Hawaii, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Dairyland Insurance Company v. RichardsArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Home Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. SchultzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Sebold v. Mallace, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1973