Legal Opinion

Wilhide v. Keystone Insurance Company

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1961No. Civ. A. 7147PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

This matter is presently before the Court on motion of defendant to dismiss for the following reasons:

1. Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.

2. Lack of jurisdiction over the person of the plaintiff.

3. Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

4. Failure to join Warehousing and Equipment Corporation, assured, as an indispensible party.

This being a motion to dismiss based on the insufficiency of the com plaint to set forth a cause of action, the facts averred in the complaint must be taken as admitted. 2 Moore’s Fed. Practice, 2d Ed., H 12.08.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keystone Insurance v. Warehousing & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. A. Rose & Son, Inc. v. Zurich General Accident, Etc., Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Binswanger v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Litto v. Public Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Medeiros v. First Insurance Co. of Hawaii, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dairyland Insurance Company v. RichardsArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Home Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. SchultzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Sebold v. Mallace, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API