Mirowitz v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
The offense is aggravated assault by an adult male upon a female; the punishment was assessed at a fine of $1,000 and confinement in jail for two years.
The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged. The prosecutrix testified that she was twenty-one years of age and a college student. She had been employed as an undercover agent by John Irvin, an investigator of the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners. She saw in the Dallas directory where Jack Mirowitz was advertised, among other things, as a Ph.D. and clinical psychologist dealing with marriage counseling, hypnosis,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sensabaugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Mounts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hammond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Parr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Mahaffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.