Legal Opinion

Parr v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1980No. 59386PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for delivery of heroin. After a jury returned a guilty verdict, the court assessed punishment at ten years.

Appellant contends that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment because it failed to allege an offense. The indictment alleges that appellant “did then and there intentionally and knowingly deliver to Donnie Moore heroin, a controlled substance in Penalty Group 1.... ” Assuming that the matter is properly before us, the contention that the indictment fails to allege an offense because “Donnie Moore heroin”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Blansett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Duran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Blassingame v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Cantelon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  4. Sawyers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Mowbray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API