Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Kay

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 30, 2010No. 2 CA-CV 2009-0185PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this quiet title action, Lyle Robinson and Molly Robinson (the Robinsons) appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Thomas Kay and Dena Kay (the Kays) on the Robinsons’ claim that they had an implied easement to use a roadway over the Kays’ property. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 On appeal from a summary judgment, “we view the facts and all reasonable inferences from them in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Aranda v. Cardenas, 215 Ariz.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Hilley v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. Baker v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Anderson v. VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOLCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Santee v. Mesa Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API