Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Nance

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1925No. 1592PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LINDSAY, J.

(Peters, C. J., concurring.)

On June 22, 1910, the defendant Nance made, executed and delivered to the predecessor in interest of the plaintiff a promissory note for the sum of $60 payable six months from date, with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent, per annum. At the same time and place, and before delivery of the note, the defendant Tavares signed on the back thereof an indorsement reading “For value received I hereby guarantee the payment of the Avithin note, waiving notice, demand, and protest.” For several years after the maturity of the note,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunter v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  2. Macaulay v. SchurmannHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cox v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  4. Dean v. MunroeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1861

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. Barnett, United States of America v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. Bank of Hawaii v. CharHawaii Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API