Legal Opinion

Bank of Hawaii v. Char

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1958No. 4015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

MARUMOTO, J.

Appellants, John G. Duarte and T. S. Shinn, were endorsers of a promissory note in the principal sum of $25,000, made by Y. H. Char and Wm. H. Crozier, Jr., and payable to Bank of Hawaii. *18The note was dated December 6, 1946, and was due three months after date, with interest at the rate of six per cent per year. Hereafter, wherever any mention is made of the note, the reference will be to tjiat note.

On November 13, 1952, the bank filed an action at law on the note against the makers and the endorsers. At that time, no part of the principal had been paid;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Petri v. MannyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. In Re the Guardianship of WardHawaii Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Klebba v. StruempfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Henry Waterhouse Trust Co. v. KingHawaii Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bank of Hawaii & Royal Indemnity Co. v. CharHawaii Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Rosa v. CWJ Contractors, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. John G. Duarte Amd T. S. Shinn v. Bank of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API