Frison v. Ohlhauser
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Charles J. Frison appealed from a district court order denying his motion to amend judgment. Frison sought to modify the residential responsibility of his minor child with Stacey Ohlhauser and the associated child support obligation. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Frison and Ohlhauser, who were never married, had a child, W.H.O., in 1998. That year, Frison filed a complaint seeking visitation rights. In January 1999, the district court filed a judgment granting Ohlhauser residential responsibility of W.H.O., establishing a visitation schedule for Frison, and ordering Frison…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Kienzle v. SelenskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Dietz v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Lechler v. LechlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Berlin v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schroeder v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Broadwell v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Jensen v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State, County of Cass, Ex Rel. Seibold v. LeveringtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Miller v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.