Legal Opinion

United States v. Klein

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 2, 1964No. Civ. A. 18143PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSENBERG, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT This action was instituted by the United States against defendants, Sydney Klein, doing business as Standard Real Estate Company, Eugene Spirer and R. Doyne Halbritter, under the provisions of § 3490 and § 5438 of the Revised Statutes, 31 U.S.C.A. § 231 of the False Claims Act. 1 The United States main tains it suffered losses attributable to 25 false claims caused by the defendants and resulting from payments made by the Veterans Administration on guaranteed veterans home loans as authorized under the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  5. Rainwater v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Incorporated Village of Island ParkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  3. Blusal Meats, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Ekelman & Associates, Inc., and Ekelman & Associates, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Jankowitz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API